March 14

A Different Shade of Green: The Role of Parks in Developing Local Sustainable Community

I started this blog in 2019 when we were just beginning social isolation because of the Covid-19 pandemic. I never edited it or posted it because life got in the way. I fell and broke my hip; had complications and spent almost one month in hospital and rehab center; had back surgery and then broke my right arm. But now I am mostly recovered( still using a cane) and thought I needed to get back to creative work. I left the opening paragraph as I wrote it March of 2019, but finally put the finished ideas together.  Even as our state continues to open up, and the masks come off we still need the beauty and freedom of the “great outdoor” no matter where we live.  CNL

As we enter a third month of social distancing because of the Covid-19 pandemic I have chosen to start this month’s blog entries with a discussion about the place city parks have in the modern urban landscape. Many of us house-bound urbanites miss the jog in the park, the kids on the swing sets, and the little league games on the playing fields as we hide from the Covid virus. But few probably stop to think about how those parks got build and why. So here is a little history about the Dallas, Texas park system which grew from one 10 acre park in 1876 to a current park system containing 406 parks covering 21,118 acres. A park system which has greatly contributed the sustainability of the Dallas community.

What I have come to understand from studying 19th century western United States and Canada is that many of the problems encountered by those hardy settlers still confront us today.  We still seek to create safe, comfortable environments in which to live and prosper; we still want lives enriched by beauty and we still want to pass these things on to our descendants. 

The modern challenge now is the same as the historical one:  how do we create a vibrant and yet sustainable cultural and social community in which to live and how do we preserve it for future generations?  How do we encourage our students, or our community at-large, that this is an important question and one worthy of extended consideration?  How have some cities established parks and other cultural spaces that contribute to the creation of sustainable community, where the working definition of sustainable is “enough for everyone, forever?”  The current Dallas parks system is one example of how a city seeks to provide areas where its citizens can explore, play in, and enjoy the natural resources around them.  The creation of urban parks and other areas devoted to cultural activities are a demonstration of what Sharon Zukin calls “symbolic economy,” or the visible evidence of how a city demonstrates its commitment to its cultural life. (Zukin)  Urban scholar, J. Mark Schuster  notes that cities are “unique witnesses to the history of the arts.”  Cities were places where “people congregated to exchange ideas and stimulate one another’s creativity, that the economic surplus that could support the arts was centred, and that an appreciative and critical audience was available.”  They were, and are still he asserts, “cultural artifacts in themselves. . . . Many of them commissioned artists, architects, and designers to embellish them and transform them into generators of the good life. This tradition is still very much alive.”  (Schuster)

When John Neely Bryan moved into north Texas in 1839 and surveyed the area in the three forks region of the Trinity River, he established what he thought would be a lucrative indian and settler trading post.  Like all good entrepreneurs, Bryan left the area to survey other land knowing  that what he had begun was a sure fire success. By the time he returned in 1841 the Republic of Texas had signed a treaty with the Indian tribes in the area and most of them had moved from the area, so most of his customers were gone.  Bryan did not want to abandon the site, so in 1842, he invited others who had moved into the area to join him and build a permanent settlement that he called Dallas. (Dallas Historical Society- see note for name).

In 1843 Bryan married Margret Beeman and brought her to his cabin on the Trinity.  By 1843 the area had a doctor, and by 1845 a lawyer had moved to town.  In 1845 Dallas held it’s first election, the issue was Texas annexation by the United States.  Acording historical records thirty-two people were eligible to vote, 29 voted yea and 3 nea.   The area around the settlement grew in population late in 1848 the area boasted seven physicians and three general stores.  In a close vote in 1849, Dallas became the county seat for a newly formed Dallas county.  By 1850 Dallas had 430 residents and a building boom that lasted until the beginning of the Civil War.  Unlike most frontier settlements that grew as places of defense or protection in response to expansion into the wilderness, Dallas was primarily a place of commerece. (York Enstam, 5)  It was also a place where women became fairly influencial in the developing community.  So much so that in 1855, when local businessman and entrepeneur Alexander Cockrell was killed his wife Sarah expanded his enterprises and became a driving force in Dallas business as well as society.  She ran a hotel, a flour mill, and the toll road over the Trinity River. Also in the 1850s the Utopian Colony La Reunion, located on the banks of the Trinity River broke apart and the skilled European artisans moved into Dallas proper contributing to a burgeoning of cultural activities.

By 1860 the population of the Dallas stood at 678. After the Civil War the city attracted many freedmen looking for work, and by 1870 the population grew to 3,000. By investing in railroad building  the city business leaders ensured economic expansion in the 1870s. By 1880 the population had grown to 10, 385 and the city had begun to establish facilities that represented the refined, cultural aspects of the growing city, including city parks.(Dallas Parkps.org) In 1876 ten acres at Browder Springs became the first city park in Dallas.

Dallas City Park, 1910 (Dallas Historical Society)

The Texas State Fair moved to the Dallas area in 1886, when the State Fair commission opened a park on eighty acres of cotton fields just east of Dallas. Known as Fair Park the park was added to the Dallas Park system in 1904 and periodically expanded to its present size of 277 acres.

Entrance to Fair Park, 1904 (Dallas Historical Society)

In 1911 the Dallas City council hired urban planner George Kessler to create a development plan for further expansion of the city. Known as the Kessler Plan this expansion included the parks system which grew to include 12 city parks over 247 acres by 1915.  In 1923 Dallas was recognized with an award for the best park system in the United States. Between 1927 and 1930, the park system expanded to include 32 parks covering 3773acres. During the Great Depression Dallas parks benefited from the Civilian Conservation Corps and WPA  programs with workers from those programs contributing to the addition of  White Rock Lake and the Dallas Zoo to the park by 1938. In 1940 Dallas boasted 4 parks covering 5066 acres.

            Like many cities in the United States, Dallas has expanded over the years and other city master-plans like the Kessler Plan have influenced the quality of the changes. But all of  the plans included the expansion and improvement of the city parks; so that today the Dallas Park System is one of the largest in the US  and includes 406 parks covering  21,118 acres. Parks with community centers, sports fields, hiking trails, picnic areas, and open green spaces cover 18,994 acres, while 1,124 acres of water house seven city lakes and three ponds. Some parks sprawl along the Trinity River, the very river that prompted John Neely Bryant to settle in the area, and one spans a freeway that intersect the business and cultural arts areas of the city.

 White Lake spillway 2019 (Dallas Parks and Recreation)

 Trinity River Greenbelt (Dallas Parks and Recreation)

Klyde Warren Park (Dallas Parks and Recreation)

Why spend so much time, money and effort developing parks? Because they contribute to the sustainability of a community. A sentiment echoed in the Parks and Recreation Department’s mission statement: “The Dallas Park and Recreation Department’s mission is to champion lifelong recreation and serve as responsible stewards of the city’s parks ,trails, and open spaces.”

We often take the lakes, playgrounds, swimming pools, ball fields and jogging trails for granted, but we would miss them if they disappeared. So, when you can put social distancing behind you; when the Pandemic is finally over and you can greet each one another without fear of infection; go out and enjoy the city parks of your communities. They are there waiting for you.


Sources

Dallas Historical Society – historical documents concerning the history of Dallas and the formation of Dallas City Parks system

J. Mark Schuster,  “Culture in the city – cities as cultural centers” UNESCO Courier,  Sept, 1996  http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1310/is_/ai_18798921?tag=artBody;col1

DALLAS PERFORMING ARTS CULTURAL FACILITIES CORPORATION – RESOLUTION APPROVING CREATION OF CORPORATION AND APPOINTMENT OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS Finance, Audit and Accountability Committee. January 23, 2006

The History of Leisure and Recreation, Gary Pearson ttps://EzineArticles.com/expert/Gary_Pearson/226484

Zukin, Sharon, The Cultures of Cities, New York City, New York: Blackwell Publishing, 1995.

Category: Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Different Shade of Green: The Role of Parks in Developing Local Sustainable Community
January 23

Horatio Alger’s Younger Brother: Harold Lloyd and the Self-Made Man

For many of us, we get our entertainment and history from motion pictures.This has remained relatively true throughout the the roughly 120 years that popular films have existed. First we saw them at the nickelodeon, then in the movie palaces of the 1920s through the 1950s, and now in the 21st century we can stream them to smaller screens including our smart phones. During the history of the motion pictures, films often told us more about the time period they were produced in than the era depicted in the story line. Such is the case of the early silent films of Harold Lloyd. Filmed and released in the era that extolled the hero and the self -made man, these films have much to say about the American character.

“From the poverty and obscurity in which I was born and in which I passed my earliest years, I have raised myself to a state of affluence and some degree of celebrity in the world.”  (Franklin, B. 1)  The theme of raising one’s self up has long been a dominant strain in American thought and culture.  Ben Franklin, America’s premier sage, created a persona which seemed to provide a blueprint for “getting ahead” and many Americans followed his lead.  The very language of the culture encouraged the belief that a man’s destiny and fortune were dependent solely on the man himself.  Harold Lloyd and his “man in the glasses” character exemplified this model of the self-made man, still so popular in the culture of the 1920’s. 

            Tom Dardis called Lloyd “Tom Sawyer’s Younger Brother,” and equated him with the carefree Mark Twain character.  Twain’s character was in reality a reflection of another type of boyhood literature, the Horatio Alger “rags to riches” story.  Lloyd, and his on screen persona closely fit Alger’s “Ragged Dick”, character, the “plucky” boy who made good.  The relationship between Harold Lloyd and the 1920’s ideal of success, the self-made man, is reflected in his films and the drive for success evident in the American culture of the 1920’s. 

            The American concept of success and the self-made man has changed over its history.  In Apostles of the Self-Made Man, John Cawelti addressed the definition of success and the limitations in its quest.  Using both literary and historical sources he traced three strands of success that developed in American culture.  The first, in the tradition of the Protestant Ethic, stressed self-improvement for religious, moral or ethical fulfillment.  It provided the basis for self-help literature like the Horatio Alger stories, the rhetoric of “rags to riches.”  The second tradition emphasized “getting ahead.”  The ideal of economic or business success of the now.  While this strain used elements from the Protestant Ethic, it endorsed “initiative” rather than “industry,” “aggressiveness” rather than “frugality,” and “competitiveness” in place of “honesty.”  It was very much an economic type of success, and in the twentieth century it included political aspects of success.  The third strand was a more complex model, dealing with social progress.  It was the success of self-culture and was tied to individual fulfillment, measuring success in terms of social progress rather than by wealth or social status.(Cawelti 4-6)  These three strands did not progress chronologically through American history;  often they overlapped and sometimes even seemed to contradict one another. 

            One of the earliest symbol for success in America was Thomas Jefferson’s yeoman farmer, the rural hero who demonstrated the superiority of the agrarian way of life.  Untainted by “artificial aristocratic” influences, the “country-boy” succeeds through the application of “village virtue.”  (Cawelti 25)  One did not actually have to be a yeoman to be successful, but one did have to have his characteristics.  This was the success demonstrated in Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography.  To Jefferson and Franklin’s examples late nineteenth century authors like Ralph Waldo Emerson added the image of the self-cultured gentleman.  This notion which represented the third strand of success was altered by writers who came after Emerson, the notion of self-reliance was expanded and became “positive thinking.”(Cawelti 92) 

            The Horatio Alger stories were based on an extension of the country-boy myth and positive thinking.  But Alger’s heroes are not truly self-made nor do they become truly successful.  Rather than being a blueprint for getting ahead in business, they are stories which extol the virtues of the proper employee.(Cawelti 121)   

            The proponents of the success myth in the twentieth century took the agrarian ideal and the Protestant Ethic and adapted them to an ideal of success that was more compatible with the industrial realities of the country.  In a time of expanding industry and mounting personal fortunes, these “Philosophers of Success” provided an explanation and an apology for the successful man.  Harold Lloyd’s on screen persona, the “glasses character” provided the perfect depiction of the rising young man, an image that was a reflection of his off-screen life.

Horatio Alger book

            Lloyd described himself to his biographer as “a plain, freckled, ordinary American kid,”  and to complete the picture of the Twain-like character he recounted a childhood episode which involved white washing his grandmother’s fence.(Dardis 4-6)  A youthful entrepreneur, his early business enterprises included  a popcorn business, and a paper route;  even at age twelve he was determined to live the American dream.  As he was fond of quoting “If you’re short, grow.  This is America.” (Dardis 6)  His attitude was consistent with the Alger stories and the lessons of the McGuffey readers which educated generations of Americans throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth century.  Lloyd was determine to succeed at life and he found his niche in the movies.  His first roles were not satisfying because they did not allow him use his unique talents to the fullest extent.  He was not happy with those early comedy shorts, nor did they afford him great success.  When he finally developed a character that not only could be a vehicle for comedy but a social commentary as well, American movie-goers made him a star.

                             

            The “Glasses character” was a mild satire of the “all-American boy,” a character who exhibited ambition, perseverance and the possibility for success.  He was a character who could struggle, fall in love, fail, and could finally emerge triumphant.  He was a character who symbolized youth on the rise, whether he was an idler who develops a purpose in life, a soda jerk, a sales clerk, a sailor, or just a farm boy.  He was a character who truly embodied the virtues taught in the McGuffey readers, virtues which included modesty, “thoughtfulness, obedience, and happiness of outlook.” (Mosier 152)

            Lloyd’s first feature length film using the “glasses character” was Sailor Made Man, produced in 1921.  Harold plays a idle rich boy who decides to join the navy in order to win the hand a girl, and once he enlists he begins to develop the traits of the successful young man.  By chance his ship docks in the same port as his girl friend’s yacht and he arrives in town just in time to save her from the advances of a lustful sheik.  In an artfully crafted sequence which features an intricate string of gags he rescues his lady love and all live happily ever after.  

Sailor Made Man

The theme of social regeneration developed in Sailor Made Man became an integral part of the Lloyd character, and was expanded in his next film, 1922’s Grandma’s Boy.  This film drew heavily from the success images of the 1920’s culture.  Lloyd plays young Harold, the “coward of the county,”  “The boldest thing he ever did was to sing out loud in church.” (Dardis 109)  In a scene where he and the town bully compete for the hand of the prettiest girl in town he is even too timid to acknowledge that he is eating moth balls instead of candy as he sits in her parlor.  To prove his “bravery” Harold is coerced into joining the manhunt for a prowler who is terrorizing the neighborhood, but his fears seem to paralyze him.  His grandmother tells him a story about his grandfather and how he overcame cowardice while fighting in the American Civil War.  Told in flashback, Lloyd also plays grandpa complete with antique eye glasses.  At the end of the story, Grandma gives the young man Grandpa’s talisman;  armed with the charm Harold can now conquer the prowling villain and become the town hero.  With his new found courage he faces down his old nemesis, the neighborhood boy who has been making his life miserable for years.  In the course of the fight sequence, Harold briefly loses the charm and his courage.  He regains the charm only to have it fall down the well, but Granny  tells him not to worry over the loss because it was really only the handle of her umbrella.  She made up the story;  his own strength and not the charm was responsible for his success.  With his new found courage, he asks the girl to marry him “at once.” (Dardis 110)  In Grand Ma’s Boy, Lloyd “represented the success ethic of American, the wish-fulfillment of ordinary people.” (Senyard 76)  As Tom Dardis noted, ” Harold’s films were frequently at dead center in the depiction of some shared deep concerns about courage, social mobility, growing pains, and even love.” (Dardis 112) 

Grandma’s Boy

One of his most famous films, Safety Last (1923) addresses more closely the symbols of social mobility.   Safety Last is arguably one of the best of Lloyd’s films.  The film is short on plot but it is long on visual gags and stunts.  It was a mixture of comedy, dare devil stunts, and the inevitable love story.  It also shared the themes of many of the success novels of the day.  The main character is willing to do anything for success;  he is a country boy who must “make good” in the city, and the “girl-back-home” is his motivation.  This film allowed Lloyd to perfect the more technical elements of his craft.  The center piece of the action is Harold’s climb up the side of a big city skyscraper.  It took several months to film the sequence and Lloyd’s company built special shooting platforms to create the illusion of height for the climb.  The result was a sequence which both terrified the audience and made them laugh. 

Safety Last

            True to the Horatio Alger model, Harold is a country boy employed as a lowly shop clerk, trying to succeed in business so that he can marry the girl back home.  He gets an unwelcome surprise  when she comes to visit him unexpectedly.  To impress her he pretends to be a executive, and this deception sets up a series of comic gags which ultimately lead to his great publicity stunt which will prove to the boss that he is truly management material.  As  store advertisement Harold stages a “human fly” building-climb, and convinces his roommate, Bill Strothers, a dare devil climber to carryout the stunt.  The stunt man never gets to climb because as Lloyd explained, “When the time comes for Strothers to climb, his enemy the cop is found to be patrolling the beat in front of the store.  He gives chase to Strothers. . . . I reluctantly start to climb.” (Dardis 123)  The policeman will not give up the chase and Harold is forced to climb the entire building.  This sequence is the most clear cut of the Horatio Alger model:

            “the climb becomes the most decisive event in the boys life: he must climb if he wants that raise, that promotion, that girl In the midst of this comedy sequence, Lloyd strayed into areas of intense emotion:  audiences have never ceased being powerfully moved by Harold’s lonely struggle.” (Dardis 123)

The sequence becomes a “metaphor for Lloyd’s upward mobility, in face of all odds.” (Senyard 79)  Another film which highlights the notion of upward mobility, or “transformation” film, was Lloyd’s The Freshman (1925).

            The Freshman played on the 1920’s public interest in college life.  The plot line was predictable for  “college films” of the time:  small town boy goes to college, becomes football hero and gets the girl.  “The notion that hard work, with a little luck, will win the prize — any prize — is present in all of Lloyd’s films of the twenties,” and is the main theme in The Freshman.(Dardis 160)  In the film Harold Lamb goes to Tate College with a very naive view of college life gathered from films he has seen.  He quickly becomes the butt of campus jokes and mistakenly believes that the fraternity men are his friends.   In an effort to fit in he tries to join the football team, but instead of getting a chance to play, he becomes the designated practice dummy. 

The Freshman

            On the train to school Harold had met a local girl named Peggy, and the two of them are attracted to each other.  The relationship seems to be doomed because she is a working girl and he is busy becoming “big man on campus” and must stick to his college “friends.”  Peggy knows the truth but she can’t bear to tell him. 

            In an effort to impress his new friends Harold sponsors the fall dance.  In the 1920’s, as in other eras, a new suit was a sign of success.  As if to prove the old adage “clothes make the man,” Harold orders a new suit for the occasion, but the drunken tailor only had time to baste it together, and accompanies him to the dance in case there are any problems.  Harold and his new suit could have been a scene out of Alger’s Ragged Dick:

             “When Dick was dressed in his new attire, with his face and hands clean, and his hair brushed, it was difficult to imagine that he was the same boy.  He now looked quite handsome and might readily have been taken for a young gentleman.” (Alger 58)

  The “snowball gag” which Lloyd builds around his suit creates a comic but poignant sequence.  Bit by bit the suit begins to come apart while Harold is on the dance floor.  Not only does the suit unravel, so do Harold’s illusions about his new friends, none the less, he is determined “to make good” at the big football game the next day.  Harold warms the bench and watches as his team struggles against a much stronger opponent, near the end of the game the coach is forced to send him in because there are no more substitutes left uninjured. The game concludes with a daring run by Harold which includes a series of razzle-dazzle plays and stunts.  He just manages to get the ball across the goal line to win the game.  He is truly the campus hero, but he has attained something more valuable:  his girl and his pride;  he is a true success. 

           “He was decent but determined.  He was speedy, a man on the     move, somebody who would make the final touchdown even if every player on the opposite side was sitting on top of him. In this he seemed to epitomize the optimism, energy, and exuberance of a burgeoning America.” (Senyard 80)

            One of the last of Lloyd’s silent films, The Kid Brother, (1927), also considered to be one of his best, was a model of social and moral success.  It had everything going for it, great story, great gags, great main character.  It is the story of another country boy trying to make good.  Lloyd plays Harold Hickory, the physically weak youngest son of the county sheriff.  He resembles a young Abe Lincoln long held up as the perfect hero to the young school children who were educated by the McGuffey Readers still in use in the 1920’s.  All who would follow the example of Lincoln should develop the “Christian virtues of thrift, labor, industry, honesty, punctuality, and good-will;”  these were the qualities which “carried men to the successes which daily could be witnessed by the humblest of men.” (Mosier 122) 

            In this film Lloyd’s country-boy character, Harold Hickory,  takes on the qualities of a male Cinderella.  His older brothers work with his father who is the local sheriff, while he stays home to do the laundry.  The opening scene at the farm lets his audience know how clever Harold really is, as the famous Lloyd “pull-back” shot reveals that Harold has tied the laundry to a kite for “air-drying.” 

            Harold’s love interest in this film is Mary Powers (Jobyna Ralston).  She is the owner of the Original Mammoth Medicine Show, but the business is actually run by Sandoni the repulsive strong-man, and Flash Farrell, the shifty publicity agent.  When the Medicine Show arrives in town they stop at the sheriffs home to obtain a permit for their performance.  The sheriff is not home but they see Harold dressed in his father’s vest, badge, hat and gun and mistake him for the lawman.  For Harold it is love at first sight and when Mary asks for the show permit he realizes his lowly position.  Unwilling to admit who he really is, Harold gives them a permit.  They set up the show and Mary goes off for a walk in the woods where she is accosted by Sandoni, Harold arrives and “saves” her.  They talk awhile and Harold is more smitten than ever.  They say good-bye and Mary moves off toward town.  Harold is reluctant to see her go and he begins to climb a tree.  As she gets farther away he must climb higher and higher to continue their farewell.  Finally she is just a speck in the distance and he has reached the top of the pine.  Sometimes the young man’s rise is symbolic, and sometimes he is just up a tree.

            Sheriff Hickory finds out about the medicine show and sends Harold to town to close it down.  There is a fight and the wagon is destroyed by an accidental fire.  Harold takes Mary home for the night but tries to hide her from the rest of his woman-fearing  family.  The next sequence features the nightgown clad brothers trying to hide from her.  Mary does not stay the night;  she is taken away by a nosy neighbor who does not think it “proper” for her to stay in a house “with all those men.”   The next morning the brothers try to serve her breakfast in bed, but it is really Harold under the covers.  This comic scene is interrupted by a group of townspeople who accuse the sheriff of stealing the town’s “dam building” money he was supposed to be protecting.  Harold’s brothers rush out to try and find the real thief, but Harold cannot go, because its “man’s work.”

The Kid Brother

            Mary convinces him to summon up the courage to try and help his father;  he kisses her and dashes off.  He does not get far however.  His old enemy, the neighborhood bully, knocks him out and he falls into a rowboat which drifts down the river and out into the bay toward the sinister hulk of decaying ship decaying in the harbor.  The ship is where Sandoni and Farrell, the real thieves, have hidden the money.  Sandoni is still onboard and he and Harold struggle over the money satchel.  The fight sequence is both comic and acrobatic in the Lloyd style.  Only when Harold and the villain fall into the water does the young man get the upper hand, Sandoni cannot swim.  Harold rows to shore on a boat of life-preservers he has dropped over the villain.  He returns to town a hero, both to his father, and Mary.  He is now a “real Hickory.”  His rise is not spectacular, but it is the success he has wished for all of his life.

The Kid Brother

            The pursuit of success is present in some form or another in all of Lloyd’s silent films, and his on-screen character remains a reflection of the American success ethic.  His naive character did not survive the shift to “talking picture,” and the model of the brash young man on the way up did not play well during the  Depression years.  “Harold” is the epitome of the self-made man.  “The Lloyd hero was basically an uncomplicated fellow. . . . [and] he [was] closer to the mood and ideology of the time,” than any of his contemporaries. (Senyard 80)  Lloyd the producer and businessman lived the success dream of the 1920’s.  His films consistently made money and he invested wisely.  When he died in 1971 his estate was valued at approximately $6.5 million.  Today audiences admire Lloyd for his craft as a filmmaker, but they often fail to understand the appeal his character had for his generation, mainly because they do not share the mind set or “assumptions” of his era.  As Walter Kerr explains: 

           ” What was lucky for Lloyd — his falling heir to a national archetype — is unlucky for us . . . The myth of the good American has lately slipped away from us;  we look about for other, much more complicated, icons to show us back to ourselves.” (Kerr 210)

 Even so Americans still recognize the urge for success, and still strive to achieve it.  “Belief in the self-made man requires only an act of faith, and as every Sunday school boy knows, faith is simply the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” (Wylie 174) 

Bibliography

Agee, James.  Agee on Film, Reviews and Comments.  New York:             McDowell, Obolensky, Inc., 1958.

Alger, Horatio.  Ragged Dick and Mark the Match Boy.  New York:  Collier Books, 1962.

Butler, Ivan.  Silent Magic:  Rediscovering the Silent Film Era.  New York:  Ungar  Publishing, 1968.

Cahn, William.  Harold Lloyd’s World of Comedy.  London:  George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1966.

Cawelti, John G.  Apostles of the Self-Made Man:  Changing Concepts of Success in America.  Chicago:  University of Chicago Press, 1965.

Dardis, Tom.  Harold Lloyd, The Man on the Clock.  New York: Viking Press, 1983.

Everson, William.  American Silent Film.  New York:  Oxford University Press, 1978.

Franklin, Benjamin.  Autobiography and Other Writings.  Russell Nye ed.  Boston:  Houghton Mifflin, 1959.

Franklin, Joe.  Classics of the Silent Screen, A Pictorial Treasury.  Secaucus:  The Citadel Press, 1959.

Kerr, Walter.  The Silent Clowns.  New York:  Alfred A. Knopf, 1975.

Scharnhorst, Gary.  Horatio Alger, Jr.  Boston:  Twayne Publishing, 1980.

Scharnhorst, Gary with Jack Bales.  The Lost Life of Horatio Alger, Jr.  Bloomington:  Indiana University Press, 1985.

Senyard, Neil.  Classic Movie Comedians.  New York: Smithmark Publishers, Inc., 1992.

Tebbel, John.  From Rags to Riches: Horatio Alger Jr.and the American Dream.  New York:  The Macmillan Company,1963.

Wenden, D.J.  The Birth of the Movies.  New York:  P. Dutton, 1975.

Westerhoff, John H, III. McGuffey and His Readers, Piety, Morality, and Education in Nineteenth-Century America.  Nashville:  Abingdon, 1978.

Wylie, Irvin G.  The Self-Made Man in America, The Myth of Rags to Riches.  New York:  The Free Press, 1954.

Films

A Sailor-Made Man

Grandma’s Boy

Safety Last

The Freshman

The Kid Brother

Category: Historical Essays, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Horatio Alger’s Younger Brother: Harold Lloyd and the Self-Made Man